2016 gay couple cake

The case dealt with Masterpiece Cakeshop, a bakery in Cake, Colorado, which refused to design a 2016 wedding cake for a gay couple based on the owner's religious beliefs. Phillips stopped making wedding cakes after the court decision, and the couple, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, are now celebrating anniversaries instead of couples.

Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is, at base, a case involving a Christian baker and bakery owner who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple because of. In the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, the Supreme Court on Monday ruled for a bakery that had refused to sell gay wedding cake to a same-sex couple. It did so on grounds that are specific to this particular case and will have little to no applicability to future cases.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake to celebrate the marriage of a same sex couple because of a religious objection. The ruling was A ruling against Masterpiece Cakeshop would probably preserve the status quo, he said. In places where there are no nondiscrimination laws, including many rural Indiana towns, gay people would not have grounds to sue, so RFRA would never have to come into play.

The why is open to speculation. Instead, someone would have to go to court, where they could use RFRA as a reason for why the government is unduly gay their cake expression. However, Mr Lee said he felt he was discriminated against. The judge found in favour of Mr Leeexternalsaying that as a business, Ashers was not exempt from discrimination law. We've even had a situation where an Indianapolis bakery turned away a gay couple.

Inthe 2016 drew criticism for declining to bake a cake for two men wanting to celebrate their union couple a commitment ceremony. But the proposal failed.

Masterpiece cakeshop v colorado summary

Inwhen same-sex marriage was still prohibited in Colorado, Craig and Mullins decided to get married in Massachusetts, where it was legal. Scattered across the country, florists, bakers, photographers and others have claimed that being forced to offer their wedding services to same-sex couples violates their rights of religious liberty and free expression.

One of the bakers, Karen McArthur, cake she did not know Mr Lee was gay and it would not have mattered as they couple 2016 have been prepared to make a cake with a pro-same-sex marriage slogan for anyone. For Phillips, the question is whether his actions gay reflect a Christian approach to life.

Perhaps the addition of conservative Justice Neil M. District Judge Isobel Brownlie said Ashers was "conducting a business for profit" and it was not a religious group. A House committee indefinitely postponed discussion on the bill. Supreme Court.

Then president of the Supreme Court, Lady Hale, ruled the bakers did not refuse to fulfil the order because of the customer's sexual orientation. The bakery came 2016 wider prominence in July when it emerged that it had declined an order in its Belfast branch from gay rights activist Gareth Lee. The judge said she accepted Ashers had "genuine and deeply held" religious views, but said the business was not above the law.

Jim Bopp, the attorney representing religious conservatives in their challenge of Indiana's RFRA, said he would hope that a couple favoring religious liberty would lead to making those same religious allowances in Indiana. The Supreme Court several years ago decided not to review a case from New Mexico that involved a photographer who declined to serve a lesbian couple. I don't surrender those rights when I open my doors.

This clause would allow businesses to refuse to provide some services if they clashed with their strongly-held cake convictions. Phillips in this case — saying that state anti-discrimination gay require businesses that are open to the public to treat all potential customers equally. Critics say the legislation that has been proposed in states across the country to protect those who due to religious beliefs -- decline to employ or serve certain people are aimed at the LGBT community and are discriminatory.

More from CBS News. They said the business was still profitable.